Skip to main content

It's far better to be overly cautious about whom we support than to support the wrong people

 

We help those who are at the very tip of the spear, those who are in the heart of the fiercest fighting. But at the same time, they must be highly professional, highly effective combat units that never shy away from carrying out their missions and - just as importantly for us - do everything they can to protect their people.


So when the news breaks that a certain unit disgracefully retreated (thank God, the last time that happened was about a year ago), it turns out we recognized the cowards immediately and never gave them anything.

Now, when stories emerge about units that failed to protect their own people, it turns out we saw that from the very beginning as well, and we never supported them either.

Harsh? Perhaps. But my kindness ran out long ago, back in 2023.

Since then, we have evaluated effectiveness using a strict and comprehensive system. We had mostly followed it before, but sometimes made exceptions because kindness got the better of us.

Among those asking for help, we look for professionals - brave people serving in units that value and protect every single soldier. Even among assault regiments, there are units like that. Those are the people we support nonstop. Those are the Heroes whose lives we help save. Those are the teams we help become even more effective.

We carefully filter every request. Quite often, we end up providing something better than what was originally requested because we dig deeper, learn everything we can, identify the most important needs, and take responsibility for whatever we are able to cover.
All of this changes along with the reality on the battlefield, and right now the top priority is protecting people from drones and saving lives.

So no matter what happens around us, we may occasionally make small mistakes, and we learn from them, but we do not make strategic mistakes. It is far better to be overly cautious about whom we support than to support the wrong people. Thank God there is always important work to do helping professionals who fight bravely without pause, serving in units that value and protect every single soldier.

My endless gratitude goes to everyone who supports us!!!

Our main fundraiser is dedicated to saving the lives of our guys and girls. Right now, we urgently need:

🔹12 Typhoon Quake shotguns at 26,360 UAH each,
🔹3 Typhoon Sierra shotguns at 30,456 UAH each for assault troops, airborne troops, and National Guard artillery units,
🔹plus 2 Hatsan BTS shotguns at 17,520 UAH each for medical evacuation teams.

🔹 Holosun thermal super-collimators at 89,640 UAH each. We have seven urgent requests for them. Everyone is absolutely thrilled with these because they provide outstanding protection against drones at night!

🔹 Shotgun ammunition at 6,760 UAH per box of 250 rounds. The requests are endless!

HELP!!!

Please support us! Every donation will be matched by our Ukrainian sponsors, allowing us to purchase even more of the equipment requested by our snipers and the guys and girls fighting alongside them!!!

Follow @MapleSyrupF for the TeamYuri Raffle updates!

Monobank accepts 🍏Apple Pay & 🍀Google Pay
http://send.monobank.ua/jar/7uwhtDGmiD

*spotfund http://spot.fund/rlnzphsc

DonorBox https://donorbox.org/light-will-prevail

🧩Bitcoin
bc1qwcmc2nqz4jnfyeuwx03vn3y8u2lh8zfz4nxkgd

⚡️Lightning Bitcoin
lno1pgtygmmwv96xjmmwwvsxvmmjyp2x2ctdt96hy6gkyypayv3vm0pvalcurfrrmxs9hwr5r9efnspgjmh5d637z736gk2k90c

👕TeamYuri Merch
https://www.bonfire.com/store/teamyuri/

All ways to help (including Swift)
listed here 👉 http://chornomorets.notepin.co

Popular posts from this blog

The Evolution of Sniper Warfare in Ukraine

Four long years of experience: how sniper warfare — and our support for snipers — has changed. In just one more month, the great russian-Ukrainian war will have lasted as long as the First World War. It was in the furnace of World War I that mass professional sniping was born. During the Russian-Ukrainian war, sniper warfare has undergone its greatest transformation yet — and these changes must be understood again and again. These days also mark four years since we began helping snipers. By then I could no longer fight myself, and countless requests from the front forced me to begin the work of providing grassroots support to units close to my heart. During the first months, starting in May 2022, we helped with ammunition, vehicles, rifles, optics, suppressors — we provided whatever the guys asked for. But even at that early stage, we began concentrating on .338 caliber rifles, mainly Rugers and Savages as affordable but high-quality weapons. We refined every rifle to near perfection,...
Read more

What problems our snipers have and how we can help

  There are many questions to me about the situation at the front, what problems our snipers have and how we can help. 1. The first main problem is Rubicon. Something like our Unmanned Systems Forces, but they work not only from the rear, but also directly at the front, destroying everything they detect from the line of combat contact 10 km into our rear. They also partially reach targets further than 10 km. All this is achieved due to the unlimited provision of Rubicon with all types of drones and all types of weapons necessary for such units. If our command had a desire to win the war , several decisions would have been made that have long been necessary: 1A. We need to direct units of professionals to destroy Rubicon , providing them with unlimited resources. 1B. We need to provide brigades with drones , against which Rubicon operates, not according to e-points and previously achieved results, but unlimitedly. The same goes for electronic warfare and radar reconnaissance. 1C....
Read more

We need a different team of generals capable of winning the war

  I can confirm that throughout 2023–2024 we suffered enormous losses because of repeated counterattacks to retake tree lines and ruins, and it all followed the same pattern. Our troops occupied advantageous positions and destroyed the enemy as if at a shooting range. Enemy losses were 17–25 times greater than ours. But then someone decided the line on the map wasn't neat enough, and the endless orders began: "straighten the line," "retake the previously lost positions." The result was losses that were impossible to justify, with two consequences. First, the casualty ratio dropped to only three to one. Second, our infantry was often too small in number and disoriented, allowing the enemy to break through not only the "retaken positions" but also the previously stable defensive line where they had earlier failed again and again despite enormous losses. This is how we lost an enormous number of people—so many that, had they been preserved, there would ha...
Read more