Skip to main content

We need a different team of generals capable of winning the war

 

I can confirm that throughout 2023–2024 we suffered enormous losses because of repeated counterattacks to retake tree lines and ruins, and it all followed the same pattern.

Our troops occupied advantageous positions and destroyed the enemy as if at a shooting range. Enemy losses were 17–25 times greater than ours. But then someone decided the line on the map wasn't neat enough, and the endless orders began: "straighten the line," "retake the previously lost positions."

The result was losses that were impossible to justify, with two consequences. First, the casualty ratio dropped to only three to one. Second, our infantry was often too small in number and disoriented, allowing the enemy to break through not only the "retaken positions" but also the previously stable defensive line where they had earlier failed again and again despite enormous losses. This is how we lost an enormous number of people—so many that, had they been preserved, there would have been far less need for new mobilization.

The second recurring pattern was the rotations in 2023–2024. During these rotations, the enemy struck newly arrived units and broke through. These constant rotations to patch holes elsewhere, with breakthroughs as the inevitable consequence, were also characteristic of Syrskyi's style.

Any other army in the same situation would have assigned sectors of responsibility to large formations—divisions, corps, armies—and reinforced them with fresh battalions. Instead, we saw the constant creation of new units and endless crisis micromanagement instead of an overall strategy.

By 2025–2026, this entire Syrskyi-style way of fighting had become impossible because of drones. Yet attempts to continue fighting this way have not stopped. Fighting through unjustified losses and constant micromanagement without sustained support has simply become a habit. If earlier this approach cost us Ocheretyne, now it is Siversk. The strategy remains the same: weaken our own forces and allow the enemy to gain the advantage.

Anyone would have replaced General Syrskyi long ago with someone more capable. Anyone would also have sought the advice of a trusted military adviser instead of reacting emotionally and trying to command military professionals directly.

At the end of 1942, Stalin recognized the brilliance of General Antonov, whose phenomenal memory impressed him, and made him his principal adviser. It was precisely because Stalin listened to Antonov that the victories which followed became possible. Antonov also had the courage to tell Stalin the truth in private, although after the war Stalin's pride resurfaced, and he sent Antonov away to the provinces in 1948.

Churchill and Roosevelt tested generals and replaced them until they found commanders who did not merely fight, but who won. Once they found winners, they tolerated them despite all their eccentricities.

Today, in the era of drone warfare, we objectively need a different kind of war than the one fought under Syrskyi and Zelenskyy in previous years. We need a different team of generals capable of winning the war that is being fought today, because Syrskyi's methods lead toward defeat once the enemy completes its mobilization. And we must have the patience to trust new generals instead of interfering with their command.

Right now everything feels hopeless, but we continue doing everything we can to save the lives of the Warriors of Light. They urgently need:

🔹 Typhoon Sierra shotguns — 30,456 UAH each, 4 still needed!

🔹 Holosun thermal super-collimators — 89,640 UAH each. There are requests for 9 of them!

🔹 Shotgun ammunition — 6,760 UAH per box of 250 rounds. The requests are endless!

🔹 Typhoon Quake shotguns — 26,300 UAH each. There are already requests for at least 8 of them!

Please help—every donation will be matched by our Ukrainian sponsors!!!

Follow @MapleSyrupF for the TeamYuri Raffle updates!

Monobank accepts 🍏Apple Pay & 🍀Google Pay
http://send.monobank.ua/jar/7uwhtDGmiD

*spotfund http://spot.fund/rlnzphsc

DonorBox https://donorbox.org/light-will-prevail

🧩Bitcoin
bc1qwcmc2nqz4jnfyeuwx03vn3y8u2lh8zfz4nxkgd

👕TeamYuri Merch
https://www.bonfire.com/store/teamyuri/

All ways to help (including Swift)
listed here 👉 http://chornomorets.notepin.co

Popular posts from this blog

The Evolution of Sniper Warfare in Ukraine

Four long years of experience: how sniper warfare — and our support for snipers — has changed. In just one more month, the great russian-Ukrainian war will have lasted as long as the First World War. It was in the furnace of World War I that mass professional sniping was born. During the Russian-Ukrainian war, sniper warfare has undergone its greatest transformation yet — and these changes must be understood again and again. These days also mark four years since we began helping snipers. By then I could no longer fight myself, and countless requests from the front forced me to begin the work of providing grassroots support to units close to my heart. During the first months, starting in May 2022, we helped with ammunition, vehicles, rifles, optics, suppressors — we provided whatever the guys asked for. But even at that early stage, we began concentrating on .338 caliber rifles, mainly Rugers and Savages as affordable but high-quality weapons. We refined every rifle to near perfection,...

What problems our snipers have and how we can help

  There are many questions to me about the situation at the front, what problems our snipers have and how we can help. 1. The first main problem is Rubicon. Something like our Unmanned Systems Forces, but they work not only from the rear, but also directly at the front, destroying everything they detect from the line of combat contact 10 km into our rear. They also partially reach targets further than 10 km. All this is achieved due to the unlimited provision of Rubicon with all types of drones and all types of weapons necessary for such units. If our command had a desire to win the war , several decisions would have been made that have long been necessary: 1A. We need to direct units of professionals to destroy Rubicon , providing them with unlimited resources. 1B. We need to provide brigades with drones , against which Rubicon operates, not according to e-points and previously achieved results, but unlimitedly. The same goes for electronic warfare and radar reconnaissance. 1C....

Why we train marksmen and not invest everything exclusively at the longest-range sniper groups

I am asked why we train marksmen, invest time and resources, and not throw everything exclusively at sniper groups fighting with the longest-range rifles? Today I came across an interesting testimony from the front. Svyatoslav Yavorivsky ( slavko.yavir on fb): "The effectiveness of shooting with an AK-74 or AR-15 at 300-400 m is practically zero, and cartridges cost money. A machine gun firing point immediately becomes a target for drones.  No one has canceled infantry combat, but we need to return to the good old mass sniping, that is, marksmen. The Finns once completely demoralized the Red Army in this way. A detachment of stormtroopers should be supported by one machine gun and two marksmen (local accurate separate shooters). This is not a sniper with a two-meter "paddle" of large caliber, but an accurate shooter at 400-500 m, with a semi-automatic rifle, who supports defensive combat or assault from cover. The Americans have been doing this for a long time. To train...