Skip to main content

We live in times of populism in politics

We live in times of populism in politics.


This is especially felt in Ukraine.


The help we received was always insufficient. In the spring of 2022, this help did not allow us to hope for a successful defeat of the enemy near Kyiv - but we did it.

We had no chance to recapture Kherson - but we did it.

We had no chance to attack the overwhelming enemy forces in the Kharkiv region - but we did it.

And if everything was provided in the fall of 2022 that was later provided in 2023, then we would have recaptured Crimea.

But they either gave us too little, and this was Biden's policy, or they didn't give us anything for a long time - and this was Trump's policy.


What now?

Trump declares an era of peace.

But the world war is already underway.

This evil is fighting against the West and pressing on all fronts, among which the Ukrainian one is the main one, but not the only one.

Therefore, we will see a presidency of war, not peace. Trump will only try to transfer the global war from the stage of heated conflicts to the stage of a protracted trade and economic war.

One way or another, the West has only one chance to survive: it is necessary to give a lesson to the evil's axis of dictators and autocrats, showing that without the support of the West, their supposed power is worthless.


Either the West will overcome the axis of evil with a united front, or the free people will wage their guerrilla war against the axis of evil.

Under such conditions, Ukraine must become a self-sufficient player that fights bravely, destroying the enemy in its deep rear.


Our enemy is not going to reconcile with us. 

It wants to conquer all of Ukraine and destroy us all.


We need 

🔹Maximum mobilization and relying on our own strength here in Ukraine.

🔹Rebooting Ukraine so that it becomes as effective as possible and becomes a community of free people, and does not descend into a small image of Russia.

🔹Maximum support from the West, much greater and much more effective, because dictators must be taught.


The people of the West want a decisive policy, and everyone who advocates de-escalation will lose. 

This can be seen not only on the example of the USA, but also on the example of Germany. And speaking of the USA, if the democrats had helped the Ukrainians defeat the aggressor, then today they would be celebrating the victory, and not be disappointed by the defeat. 

Quickly ending wars with the victory of the West is always profitable, although it requires significant resources in a short time - but then you don't spend anything! Prolonging wars leads to much higher costs over a long period of time, and to a loss of authority - and to the impossibility of winning elections!


One way or another, the world war continues, and it must be won by the free world.

And no matter what governments do, the fate of the world is largely in the hands of free people. As never before in history, free people from all over the world can help the cause of Freedom, strengthening Ukrainians in their fight against the aggressor. 

We must make the most of these opportunities.


Thank you to all free people for your solidarity, we need to maintain it and move forward as one united front!




Popular posts from this blog

The solidarity of the people replaced the institutions, because the latter were extremely passive

⬇️ Long read with stories and adult assessments that may not please everyone , but I, for my part, as a person, as a professor, as a volunteer, do everything I can and more, just like our snipers. What the state did, read below. Our assistance to snipers began in the spring of 2022, as the Azov snipers , who were stopping the enemy’s advance on Zaporizhzhia, asked us for cartridges. Who should have given them cartridges? The state! But we did, and this played a decisive role in stopping the advance during intense fighting in the Huliaipole area. Then we called the fundraising “People’s Cartridge,” because the people replaced the state. The solidarity of the people replaced the institutions, because the latter were extremely passive . We also began to help Serhiy Poznyak with cartridges – and have been helping for three years now, because the state does not even think of investing in his special forces platoon. Everything is based on enthusiasm, and we are grateful that they were allowe...
Read more

The Evolution of Sniper Warfare in Ukraine

Four long years of experience: how sniper warfare — and our support for snipers — has changed. In just one more month, the great russian-Ukrainian war will have lasted as long as the First World War. It was in the furnace of World War I that mass professional sniping was born. During the Russian-Ukrainian war, sniper warfare has undergone its greatest transformation yet — and these changes must be understood again and again. These days also mark four years since we began helping snipers. By then I could no longer fight myself, and countless requests from the front forced me to begin the work of providing grassroots support to units close to my heart. During the first months, starting in May 2022, we helped with ammunition, vehicles, rifles, optics, suppressors — we provided whatever the guys asked for. But even at that early stage, we began concentrating on .338 caliber rifles, mainly Rugers and Savages as affordable but high-quality weapons. We refined every rifle to near perfection,...
Read more

What problems our snipers have and how we can help

  There are many questions to me about the situation at the front, what problems our snipers have and how we can help. 1. The first main problem is Rubicon. Something like our Unmanned Systems Forces, but they work not only from the rear, but also directly at the front, destroying everything they detect from the line of combat contact 10 km into our rear. They also partially reach targets further than 10 km. All this is achieved due to the unlimited provision of Rubicon with all types of drones and all types of weapons necessary for such units. If our command had a desire to win the war , several decisions would have been made that have long been necessary: 1A. We need to direct units of professionals to destroy Rubicon , providing them with unlimited resources. 1B. We need to provide brigades with drones , against which Rubicon operates, not according to e-points and previously achieved results, but unlimitedly. The same goes for electronic warfare and radar reconnaissance. 1C....
Read more