Skip to main content

Behind every act of heroism stands carefully planned material support

Increasingly, snipers are leading groups carrying out special missions behind enemy lines, in the grey zone, and in the most dangerous places. We try to provide as much support as possible because the risks are always enormous. But when everything goes well, excellent results are guaranteed!


Behind every act of heroism stands carefully planned material support, without which heroism would be a wasted effort. Professionalism, character, and equipment all matter long before there is any opportunity for heroism. That is why we are grateful to the guys for their professionalism, character, and heroism — this is a legendary group! And we are grateful to the friends who support our snipers for providing the Heroes with the equipment they need!!!

Friends, all your support is matched by Ukrainian sponsors and directed toward supporting the very best sniper groups.
There are so many requests right now — and everything is needed yesterday!!!

HELP!!!!

Follow @MapleSyrupF for the TeamYuri Raffle updates!



🧩Bitcoin
bc1qwcmc2nqz4jnfyeuwx03vn3y8u2lh8zfz4nxkgd

⚡️Lightning Bitcoin
lno1pgtygmmwv96xjmmwwvsxvmmjyp2x2ctdt96hy6gkyypayv3vm0pvalcurfrrmxs9hwr5r9efnspgjmh5d637z736gk2k90c

Monobank accepts 🍏Apple Pay & 🍀Google Pay

👕TeamYuri Merch

All ways to help (including Swift)

Popular posts from this blog

The Evolution of Sniper Warfare in Ukraine

Four long years of experience: how sniper warfare — and our support for snipers — has changed. In just one more month, the great russian-Ukrainian war will have lasted as long as the First World War. It was in the furnace of World War I that mass professional sniping was born. During the Russian-Ukrainian war, sniper warfare has undergone its greatest transformation yet — and these changes must be understood again and again. These days also mark four years since we began helping snipers. By then I could no longer fight myself, and countless requests from the front forced me to begin the work of providing grassroots support to units close to my heart. During the first months, starting in May 2022, we helped with ammunition, vehicles, rifles, optics, suppressors — we provided whatever the guys asked for. But even at that early stage, we began concentrating on .338 caliber rifles, mainly Rugers and Savages as affordable but high-quality weapons. We refined every rifle to near perfection,...
Read more

What problems our snipers have and how we can help

  There are many questions to me about the situation at the front, what problems our snipers have and how we can help. 1. The first main problem is Rubicon. Something like our Unmanned Systems Forces, but they work not only from the rear, but also directly at the front, destroying everything they detect from the line of combat contact 10 km into our rear. They also partially reach targets further than 10 km. All this is achieved due to the unlimited provision of Rubicon with all types of drones and all types of weapons necessary for such units. If our command had a desire to win the war , several decisions would have been made that have long been necessary: 1A. We need to direct units of professionals to destroy Rubicon , providing them with unlimited resources. 1B. We need to provide brigades with drones , against which Rubicon operates, not according to e-points and previously achieved results, but unlimitedly. The same goes for electronic warfare and radar reconnaissance. 1C....
Read more

We need a different team of generals capable of winning the war

  I can confirm that throughout 2023–2024 we suffered enormous losses because of repeated counterattacks to retake tree lines and ruins, and it all followed the same pattern. Our troops occupied advantageous positions and destroyed the enemy as if at a shooting range. Enemy losses were 17–25 times greater than ours. But then someone decided the line on the map wasn't neat enough, and the endless orders began: "straighten the line," "retake the previously lost positions." The result was losses that were impossible to justify, with two consequences. First, the casualty ratio dropped to only three to one. Second, our infantry was often too small in number and disoriented, allowing the enemy to break through not only the "retaken positions" but also the previously stable defensive line where they had earlier failed again and again despite enormous losses. This is how we lost an enormous number of people—so many that, had they been preserved, there would ha...
Read more